This site is archived. For my brand new live site go to Struggle Forever!

18 March 2007

On Anarchism

Anarchism has gotten a bad rap, and it's really no wonder why. It has been systematically demonized by the press and public officials, equated with terrorism, put down as the self-indulgent fantasies of adolescent boys, or simply labeled “impractical.” I have no doubt that there are some anarchists who are only in it so they can blow shit up, and there is a nebulous conception in many anarchists minds about what it would look like in practice. There is no unifying principle, nobody dictating what to do, and that makes it difficult as well as opening the door to a lot of people with their own agenda. But the majority of anarchists that I've met are kind thoughtful people, who have spent a lot of time working through the ambiguities and distortions in order to live better lives.
There are a lot of misconceptions surrounding anarchism, both outside of and within the community. It is not an ideology, but rather a lack of ideology or better yet an anti-ideology which says that any centralized, abstract, bureaucratic power structure is inherently oppressive and should be resisted by any means possible. The Marxists got it wrong by handing power over to the state, and the capitalists got it wrong by not reigning in the corporations.
Anarchism doesn't imply a lack of social structure, it seeks a reorganization of society to limit the reach of power. The ideal system is one which disperses power keeping it as localized and small scale as possible. In the words of Edward Abbey “Anarchy is democracy taken seriously.” It is not a utopian vision; there will always be problems to overcome and challenges to be met, but it is the most appealing social structure to our collective nature.
The question of practicality is more difficult. For most of our existence humans have lived without these complex power structures, in fact, they didn't develop until well after the adoption of agriculture and settled societies about ten thousand years ago. However, most modern attempts at anarchism, such as the Israeli Kibbutzim, the CNT of the Spanish Revolution, and a few experiments that arose in the chaos of the French Revolution, have been small scale and short lived. With modern population levels and international politics being what they are, it's doubtful that any anarchist community would last long. For now, we must be content to carve out a small space within modern society to live and work together in the spirit of mutual aid.

2 comments:

Brendan said...

What should I read, if I want to understand anarchism better?

Jeremy Trombley said...

Read the classics: Bakunin, Malatesta, Kropotkin, Proudhon, Goldman. Read Chomsky, Bookchin and Edward Abbey. Read Daniel Guerin's book Anarchism: From Theory to Practice. Go to the Anarchy Archives at
http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_Archives/index.html
and meander through the information there.
Just bear in mind through all of the varying theories that the heart of anarchism is the elimination of abstract, centralized power. Broadly speaking the important questions are Where is power concentrated? What can be done to break that power up? and what structures can be put in place that would prevent further concentrations of power in the future?
Practically speaking the questions have to be local - what will work best for us here? There are no universal answers.

Related Posts with Thumbnails